Well, it seems we have come to an agreement then Sunny. You just stated my argument better than I could have stated it myself. In the spirit of Bertrand Russell, I acknowledge your effort. I have a feeling you didn’t do this on purpose though. It took me a minute to find the original offending post, the one where you said I “wont/cant” post my proof. I couldn’t find it at first because I searched for the proper spelling, but no matter.
It would be great if you could show how that post of yours fits with the rule that you just restated here. Here’s your post"
To repeat myself from above, something I am not obligated to do, there is no rule against ASKING for proof. You can make a claim. Someone can make the exact opposite claim. Anyone can ask for proof. Sometimes we go off on tangents about what the scientific methods are, what logic is, why proof is a good thing. All of that is fine.
What’s not fine, is telling someone that they are unable to provide proof, that there is something flawed or wrong with the person making the claim. That’s what you did. It might have gone unnoticed if you had not just completed a two day troll move of saying BLM isn’t implementing policies, then asked me which policies. Before that you made some twisted insults at “The Left” because something from the 70’s. It’s a pattern of not responding to questions, changing the subject, vague references, and getting personal.