No true relationship

This morning I heard a pastor on a podcast say that if someone in a relationship refuses to admit that they could be wrong, then that relationship is essentially over. They may continue in some way, but it’s no longer truly a relationship. That’s not that simple of a statement, but it makes sense. Now, turn it around. It means if you are not listening to different points of view, if you aren’t trying to understand what others are saying, if you aren’t watching for their non-verbal cues of discomfort or frustration, if you are saying things like “that’s just what I believe" or “I don’t want to talk about it", then you aren’t in relationship.
I’m not suggesting we should try to be in relationships with the whole world, but at least let’s start building something. Even if you vehemently disagree on something fundamental to your identity, there is most likely something you can find to agree on. We all need food, air and water, that’s a good place to start. Kittens, puppies, also good.

Music is good too.

This morning I heard a pastor on a podcast say that if someone in a relationship refuses to admit that they could be wrong, then that relationship is essentially over. They may continue in some way, but it’s no longer truly a relationship. That’s not that simple of a statement, but it makes sense. Now, turn it around. It means if you are not listening to different points of view, if you aren’t trying to understand what others are saying, if you aren’t watching for their non-verbal cues of discomfort or frustration, if you are saying things like “that’s just what I believe" or “I don’t want to talk about it", then you aren’t in relationship.
Well isn't that the fundament problem of the moment. We have half the people voting for someone who has absolutely no respect for honesty or telling the truth. We have a religious faith-based community that feels fully justified ignoring fundamental Earth Facts. We have a right-wing community who's utterances are backed up by, for me, unimaginable certitude. I know if you look you can find lefties as extreme and disconnected from serious science, but it's not near the fundamental feature of the political landscape - the way it's become with the Republican crowd. The whole taking oneself so damned seriously. What happened to a little self-deprecation? Or how about the notion that we need the other's understanding to help complete our own? and so on and so forth . . .
We have half the people voting for someone who has absolutely no respect for honesty or telling the truth. Yea, and she almost won. We have a religious faith-based community that feels fully justified ignoring fundamental Earth Facts. So, you are saying creation is not a true fact? God will take care of us. We have a right-wing community who's utterances are backed up by, for me, unimaginable certitude. You could include the left wing pollsters too. I know if you look you can find lefties as extreme and disconnected from serious science, but it's not near the fundamental feature of the political landscape - the way it's become with the Republican crowd. Give the hardworking man a break and a good paycheck and maybe he would have time for some serious science. Na, most likely, more beer. The whole taking oneself so damned seriously. What happened to a little self-deprecation? Or how about the notion that we need the other's understanding to help complete our own? Already there. :-) and so on and so forth . . .
So, you are saying creation is not a true fact? God will take care of us.
And now your true stripes show. You are a creationist. That explains a lot about your incoherent posts over the years.
So, you are saying creation is not a true fact? God will take care of us.
And now your true stripes show. You are a creationist. That explains a lot about your incoherent posts over the years. Creationism is a godly IQ test.
So, you are saying creation is not a true fact? God will take care of us.
And now your true stripes show. You are a creationist. That explains a lot about your incoherent posts over the years. No, the incoherency is most likely from being in a hurry and bad communication skills.
So, you are saying creation is not a true fact? God will take care of us.
And now your true stripes show. You are a creationist. That explains a lot about your incoherent posts over the years. No, the incoherency is most likely from being in a hurry and bad communication skills. You got the "bad communication skills" part correct. Clarity is the writer's responsibility.
So, you are saying creation is not a true fact? God will take care of us.
And now your true stripes show. You are a creationist. That explains a lot about your incoherent posts over the years. No, the incoherency is most likely from being in a hurry and bad communication skills. You got the "bad communication skills" part correct. Clarity is the writer's responsibility. Tell me something that I don't already know. I'm no writer. May never develop the skills. Thank god for spell check. I am doing the best I can.
Tell me something that I don't already know.
Oh come on, that's too easy.

nice JS. :slight_smile:

I have a problem when any says a person is not a true “anything”. Why I have a problem with this is when I hear it used often by people claiming to be religious when they say to another,“you are not a true Christian”, for example. But when they make such an assertion it is always when another refuses to essentially believe exactly as the do. If that is a correction definition of being a true anything, I am a big time failure of life.