I’m glad you’re happy. But your actions are avoidance. I’m sure you see a connection from the so-called singularity that the math points at the early milliseconds of the Big Bang and plasma, but the singularity is not a “fundamental plasma state” as far as anything I know. If I’m missing something, I’m glad to learn, but I’m not going to cite this forum thread as a scientific resource. I’m not going to say, “well Write4U said it’s true, so it’s true”.
I can’t figure out what our disconnect is. I know you know what scientific citations are. I know you know about formulas describing the universe. You haven’t really acknowledged the undefined nature of the singularity. We seem to differ on the definition of “undefined”.
Yes, but I don’t claim to know what the singularity consists of. NOBODY knows.
What I have read, is that David Bohm proposed a state of pure energy before it transmutated into physical particles from the 3 fundamental values such as quarks, leptons, and bosons to atoms. This seems to be supported by the evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background.
Although there is no direct evidence for a singularity of infinite density, the cosmic microwave background is evidence that the universe expanded from a very hot, dense state.[4]
Elementary particles are quarks, leptons and bosons . These particles then join together to create the more well-known particles, such as the neutron and the proton. Such particles are known as composite particles, as they are composed of two or more of these elementary particles.