The only thing you have shown me is how pointless it is to post anything here.
The only thing you have shown me is how pointless it is to post anything here.Oh darn, he figured us out.
If Dark Matter is in the 4th dimension …how was it distributed? Were supermassive black holes involved?
Were galaxy volumes predetermined by 4D mass?
@Joseph, Watch 4 minutes of the video I postedOh, so you take three dimensions squish them into two dimensions, that are still considered 3 dimensions - then add another 4th dimension to represent the height you just squished out of existence.
Gee, is that supposed to make sense?
So we have height, width, depth and height - Is that it?
The video was just helping us understand a 4th dimension. It takes the force of a collapsing star to interact with the 4th dimension.
I think gravitational waves occur in the 4th dimension, so that means there are two ways for us to interact with it. The force of a collapsing star and events that produce gravitational waves. Gravitational waves warp spacetime in the same way time dilation happens.
The gravitational force of a point mass drops off as 1/r2 . As Sean stated above, this becomes 1/r{2+N} where N is the number of extra dimensions you are adding to a theory. In layman's terms this is because there are now more dimensions for the force to operate in, so the amount of force is more "spread out" for a given distance away.The gravitational force originates from the extra dimension ..it was already "spread out" before the test.
Doesn't matter, we already know that since the inverse-square law holds for masses we can test here (down to ~1mm) then there can't be another large dimension similar to ours holding other matter influencing us.No, it doesn't say that. Inverse-square is for 3D masses. 4D mass is dark matter ..it isn't influencing us except bending spacetime.
Don’t you see what I’ve done here? I opened the door to an additional dimension.
Is this dimension necessary? What does it offer in understanding the universe?
what? have you been reading any of this?
We now know what dark matter and gravitational waves are. How the speed of light can be constant in different time dilation volumes. Why gravity is weak. Why cosmic voids expand. What happens in a black hole …and eventually, how the big bang happened.
Yeah, I’m not going to entertain your nonsense any more. You do have some physics and mathematical knowledge, but you’re also completely oblivious to some very basic physics knowledge, such as time being the 4th dimension in “spacetime”. And you insist on adding this 5th dimension without any evidence for it, so you have to keep reusing one of the other 4 to add it. And you refuse to accept when someone points out that you got something wrong. It’s just asinine at this point. What’s more, you’re a bit of a jackass, preferring to simply insult anyone who dares try to teach you some basic physics.
The conversation would actually be interesting if you were open to actual science. Since all you’re interested in is the 5-dimensional fairy tale you keep insisting on making work, though, it’s just tedious. I can be very patient with the truly ignorant, but I cannot abide the willfully ignorant.
Pretty sure you don’t know how to read …or imagine the super difficult task of placing time in the 5th dimension …it’s all the same unit (spacetime) …it doesn’t fn matter.
I wonder if that extra time I found (in the OP) actually belongs to this new dimension:
If we take the speed of light and multiply it by 5 we get: 299,792,458 m/s x 5 = 1.49896229×10^15 Micrometers per second (1,498,962,290,000,000)I think it is telling us 1,498,962,290 m/s is the speed of light when spacetime isn’t involved.
The speed of light gets divided by 5. Is it saying time gets split between 5 different dimensions?
299,792,458 m/s x 5 = 1,498,962,290 m/s or 1,498,962,290,000,000 Micrometers per second 1,498,962,290,000,000 / 5 = 2.9979246e+14 || 299,792,460,000,000
I think this is saying the auto-observe key is actually 0.29979246 Micrometers
I guess this means I’m wrong about the quantum classical boundary scaling …because the speed of light seems to be the same (in proportion). I’m not sure if the 4th has a boundary or not.
I wonder if the fabric of spacetime is visible in the 4th dimension.
A black hole is a hole to the 4th dimension. I wonder what size the actual gateway point is. Is our 3D matter being turned virtual before passing over and turned to 4D Mass (dark matter)? Is all the mass in the 4th from black holes? Was it always that way?
I think the fabric of spacetime originates from this extra dimension.
Wait …is the dimension of time actually a duality? Is this extra dimension I’m talking about actually the 4th …but we should be calling it the spacetime dimension? Would this make Widdershins happy?
Pretty sure you don’t know how to read ..or imagine the super difficult task of placing time in the 5th dimension ..it’s all the same unit (spacetime) ..it doesn’t fn matter.Exactly what I'm talking about. If anyone disagrees with you it's all insults. I'm too stupid to understand your ignorant rantings. The real problem is that you're spouting magical nonsense. Space is literally defined as the three dimensions we can freely travel in. It was defined as such long before we contemplated other dimensions. Any dimensions outside of the 3 we can readily perceive are, by definition, not a part of "space". That is why when you add the 4th dimension of time it isn't simply "space", it's "spacetime". But at this point I really don't expect you to understand any of that because your grasp of the most basic concepts in physics are steeped in magical thinking nonsense.
No one talks about the dimension of time also being spatial …until now. A dimension of spacetime grants physicality …unless it’s dark matter.
Joseph said,No one talks about the dimension of time also being spatial …until now
That is because time is NOT spatial, it is temporal. Time has no physical properties of any kind. It is a mathematical system of measurement of duration.
You cannot measure time itself . It does not exist until you effect the duration of an expressed physical phenomenon. Time is an emergent quality, a side-effect of physical being.
Time ;
1a: the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, or condition exists or continues : DURATIONb: a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which succeed one another from past through present to future
IMO, the temporal expression; “from past through present” does not equal the spatial expression; “from there to here”. It presents a dimensional paradox.
what? GR says it does.