Adonai888 said,
- Being cannot come from non-being 0:11
That logic would also apply to God. If God can be exempt from that logic, so can any other form of causal processes.
2. Who created the creator 0:37
Precisely. Who or what created the creator? Every answer to that question can also apply to any other causal process.
3. The laws of physics point to a creator 1:33
No they don't. They point to a creative process, which can be applied to other causal mathematical imperatives other than a God.
4. Fine-tuning of the universe points to a fine-tuner 2:11
No, it doesn't. It points to all matter in the universe is a result of mathematical physical processes, not the other way around.
5. Abiogenesis research has failed 3:06
No, abiogenesis has been performed in laboratories (which is a religious argument for ID), but it only proves that universal physical mathematical potentials allow for abiogenesis.
6. The factory maker argument 4:14
Try the self-formation and self-assembly of the patterns contained in the Table of Elements already being formed inside cosmic clouds via radiation and stars via heat and pressure. Stuff is being made every second of every day since the very beginning. The universe itself is evolving constantly.
7. Cells are irreducibly complex 5:44
False, all naturally occurring complex patterns are reducible to Planck scale. All matter in the universe basically consists of three fundamental particles which emerged (self-organised) from the Chaos soon after the "Beginning Event" (BB). (read Chaos Theory)
The religious argument of the motivated “watchmaker” is a false argument. Even a watch is ultimately reducible to atoms and they are reducible to the three fundamental particles. Where do you think our 24 hr day comes from? The solar system itself is a universal time keeping organisation. Is the solar system an irreducibly complex construct?
8. Where do complex organisms come from? 7:05
Evolution and mathematical pattern formation from simple to complex patterns. It is a property of elements that they obey mathematical laws which allows for the self-formation and self-assembly of chemical compounds from individual atoms to the formation of galaxies.
9. Gene regulatory networks (dGRN’s) point to design 8:12
No, microtubules are self-forming regulatory information processors. Microtubules consist of only 2 chemical tubulins which self-assemble into dynamically growing (self-adjusting) tubes which perform several computational functions.
10. The tasks performed by the dGRN point to intelligent setup 9:24
No, they point to all forms of enfolded and unfolded mathematical patterns
Adonai, your problem is that you have invested all your study time in religious mythology. You’re not interested in studying what science has discovered and explained.
This refusal to broaden your perspective makes you willfully ignorant of the physical world and how things work in reality.
You are mistaking QUASI-INTELLIGENT DYNAMICAL MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS for a MOTIVATED INTELLIGENCE.
That is a false assumption. The universe has no motivation other than implacable mathematical imperatives.
