No one has claimed those properties are different.
It’s not the Earth’s starting condition,
it’s the series of improbable events and circumstances, that you keep leaving out.
For instance, Earth by itself could not have evolved complex life -
it required our moon, and even that impact had to arrive during a specific window of opportunity. Plus, with a slight deviation in angle of impact producing totally different results for the two.
All those living organisms were “spawned” from the same genesis event of atomic exchange and lining up into the Krebs cycle. With extremophiles probably the most genetically advanced, so don’t see what the point in that sentence is.
No one is arguing against that. But don’t forget those “probabilistic processes” have only limited ‘windows of opportunity’ - so timing is also big complicating factor in your equation.
No one is arguing against that!
WHAT!?!
So tell me, how many different origins of life do you think occurred on this planet?
There is a big difference between requirements for abiogenesis to occur, and requirements for established biology to continue evolving.
You do appreciate the difference between the two, I know you do, why ignore that with this sort of muddling of facts?
Besides, we aren’t talking about abiogenesis! We’re not talking about biological slime. We’re talking about evolved intelligent life capable of technology.
What we do know is there was one, and every other life for that we are aware of, evolved out of that one class of events that created the first biology.
And you don’t think anyone trying to write off Earth as just another lump of rock spinning around just another star, isn’t being every bit as delusional, philosophical and ‘religious’?
For that you need to get serious about studying Evolution.
But I sense the mystic of math has your imagination captured.
Some dedication google searching will show you the facts behind my claims.
Okay, examples please.