Well it was a start.
Then came Earth, child of the BB, now we’re really talking awesome enough!
It seems science has no evidence that anything ever starts. All the evidence science has is that everything is a continuation of something else. Science observes effect and assigns cause. Science accepts, even requires, that every effect we observe had a cause but we can’t prove that it did.
And we certainly tend to dismiss observed events which have no accepted cause. I wonder if those events are observed the way they are, without a satisfactory explanation as to a cause, because they actually did start without a cause and are not a continuation. That might explain why we cannot come up with satisfactory explanations for them and why we cannot repeat them.
I recall the story of people in flatland marveling at events they could not explain. They had no clue that there existed anything beyond their two dimensions. They were at a total loss to explain things that we, who are outside flatland, take for granted. Perhaps we marvel at strange events for the same reason, that we experience events that those outside our universe, outside our frame of reference, take for granted.
If the people of flatland could accept the possibility of “more” than flatland they might develop a basic means to accept and understand the interface with that “more” even without any deep understanding of it.