# We don't say everything is anything **URL:** \ **Category:** Religion and Secularism\ **Created:** [February 1, 2024, 4:03pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/we-dont-say-everything-is-anything/10686 "2024-02-01T16:03:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![lausten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/lausten/32/23705_2.png) [@lausten](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/lausten)\ **Post date:** [February 2, 2024, 10:02pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/we-dont-say-everything-is-anything/10686/2 "2024-02-02T22:02:52Z")
The forum search turned up this summary of Carrier’s work > [@Naturalism actually is moral](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/naturalism-actually-is-moral/3581): > > So, I’m taking this online course with Richard Carrier, which is mostly reading things that are available anyway, but you get to interact with him too. We’re working through his book, “Sense and Goodness”, where he develops a philosophy for life, including morals. I now see something that’s so obvious, usually that means I’ve just been missing it, but I really don’t remember ever hearing this. That is, when people say, “science doesn’t provide any answers for moral questions”, what they really … --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/we-dont-say-everything-is-anything/10686)._