I didn’t expect CC to bring in another term, but I don’t think it changes anything. As long as you are saying that there is a natural, real, physical world and we can imagine things that don’t exist in that world.It’s still the same as I said before; the imaginations exists as some sort of explainable phenomenon, regardless of how well or how accurately we can explain it, but they aren’t real in any other way, shape or form.
Actually I hate the ‘super natural’ - and agree it doesn’t change anything to what I’m trying to say.
Second sentence sounds like you’re starting to get it.
“regardless of how well or how accurately we can explain it, but they aren’t real in any other way, shape or form.”
Isn’t that what I’m trying to explain?
The physical world the ‘mind’ exists within, that is real in every way, shape and form, no matter how well we think we understand it or not.
This phenomenon allows us to “envision” what we see or what we can imagine. The “human mindscape”.That works for me.