I might agree to allow Muslims in if they agree to publicly renounce all aspects of Islam that would support terrorism in any way and be required to repeat it on a regular basis. It would not guarantee that most Muslims wouldn't lie, but it would be a start. Let them prove that they do not accept the inhumane parts of the Koran. Let them say, "I piss on those parts of the Koran that support terrorism." Maybe it would reduce the percentage if terrorists and terrorist sympathizers to a level we can handle. I can't imagine anyone refusing to make such a renunciation. If they don't accept it, they can stay out. There are probably a lot of Syrians waiting to get into the US who would make that statement. Why shouldn't they get priority? What's wrong with this suggestion?
I assume you have scientific support from sociology, psychology and historians that such a strategy would help in mitigating radicalising Islam? Or is your posting just caused by some gland of yours?
You are confusing my posts with yours, which are obviously caused by some gland.
Hey, you are the one who says we have no free will, not me! :-)
I never said the strategy would help in mitigating Islam. I offered it as a symbolic measure. Naturally you missed that, as you miss so many things. It must be those overactive glands of yours.
So let me try to understand you:
- You propose to actually introduce a
symbolic measure
- which does not mitigate problems with the Islam
- which according to every reasonable person would help radicalise some more Muslims.
Yeah, seems a very rational and good idea!