Scientifically speaking; How would you define pseudoscience?

Pseudoscience is anything that purports to be science but has no objective, testable evidence supporting its claims.
Great. Now can we translate that into the real world? twenty some views, not many. But than Inquiry ain't what it used to be. It's scary like everyone has checked out. All talked out or something. Happy simply to go through our daily routines until the end comes. Honestly isn't worth fighting or arguing about anymore. Empathy, fuk u - got my own problems. We have more information at our fingertips than ever and hell we have more ease and time than ever, yet most don't seem to have an inkling what to do with it. OH yeah, figure out how to make more profits, who cares who that hurts down the line. Our American passion, forever more, ever faster has created this self-cannibalizing monster we're all lost within. We seem reduced to little more than widgets being moved along. What's wild is how many are okay with that. Then, of course, the cascading consequences, such as a general perception that physical reality is simply one among many alternative stories our minds can make up. So a pissed off 'genius' puts up a shingle with a fancy name and we are told it deserves the same deference as organization that have spent decades doing real work. Christ if global warming, dying ocean, depleted lands were not happening, bet we'd still manage to exterminate ourselves before this century is out the way we behave and think these days. Thank God I'm a country boy. :kiss: