[quote=“lausten, post:19, topic:7932”]
It’s not the eye at all. The graphics where there is an eye and then waves and particles and slits and a wall or whatever, are misleading. The “eye” is some sort of particle or wave detector or something. It’s a measurement device. The human eye only comes in at the point of reading the output of that device.
Strange isn’t it?
I understand the scientific term “observer”, but that does not alter the fact that if the event is somehow affected by the measurement, the observer must be projecting something that has an influence on the event.
But then we run into a time paradox. When the observer detects an event, the event has already transpired and is in the past. It can no longer be influenced in any way.