# Richard Dawkins - friend and apologist of a pedophile **URL:** \ **Category:** Politics and Social Issues\ **Created:** [February 11, 2026, 11:28pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897 "2026-02-11T23:28:25Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 10\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![morgankane01](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/morgankane01/32/28536_2.png) [@morgankane01](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/morgankane01)\ **Post date:** [March 1, 2026, 12:52pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/22 "2026-03-01T12:52:32Z")
> [@morgankane01](#): > > Honestly, as long as the man or the woman does not do anything illegal, a politician having an affair is a matter for him/her, the man or the woman with whom he has an affair, and for the person with whom he lives daily, if there is one !!! > > And i don’t give a damn, except that the way he/she conducts his/her affairs can reveal his/her personality. > > Usually, I don’t use he/she, but here I want to insist on the fact that a woman is entitled to have an affair. > [@cutslikeaknife](#): > > How many pedophile friends do you have Morgan ? Are you trolling ? I said as long as they stay in the bounds of law. As far as I know, i have no pedophiles friends, but more than one who had an affair. ---
**Author:** ![lausten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/lausten/32/23705_2.png) [@lausten](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/lausten)\ **Post date:** [March 1, 2026, 2:28pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/23 "2026-03-01T14:28:25Z")
> [@morgankane01](#): > > Are you trolling ? Oh, he’s definitely trolling. He uses the “yeah but, what about" form of questions quite often. ---
**Author:** ![cutslikeaknife](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/cutslikeaknife/32/31306_2.png) [@cutslikeaknife](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/cutslikeaknife)\ **Post date:** [March 1, 2026, 11:23pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/24 "2026-03-01T23:23:48Z")
`Dont try and wiggle out of this one. You think its acceptable for the political class to be friends with rich pedophiles ?` ---
**Author:** ![thatoneguy](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/thatoneguy/32/28536_2.png) [@thatoneguy](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/thatoneguy)\ **Post date:** [March 2, 2026, 1:59am UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/25 "2026-03-02T01:59:14Z")
> [@cutslikeaknife](#): > > Are you for real ? > > Poor Bill cant explain the photo. > > [Bill Clinton breaks silence on infamous hot tub photo during Epstein testimony | Fox News](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-says-he-didnt-know-woman-infamous-jacuzzi-photo-during-closed-door-epstein-testimony) Bill is a different story. Everybody knows what he does. There’s no evidence that Hillary was involved with any of the activity at Epstein’s island. There’s no evidence she knew the extent of what was goin on. Keep in mind that doesn’t mean she didn’t know her husband was cheating on her, and was associating with Epstein. ---
**Author:** ![thatoneguy](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/thatoneguy/32/28536_2.png) [@thatoneguy](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/thatoneguy)\ **Post date:** [March 2, 2026, 2:07am UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/26 "2026-03-02T02:07:39Z")
> [@morgankane01](#): > > Usually, I don’t use he/she, but here I want to insist on the fact that a woman is entitled to have an affair. I used to laugh at liberal cucks, but now I’m just like ![giphy](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/centerforinquiry/original/3X/1/4/1476edf35a725bc1db58c32559ab18b002fea483.gif) ---
**Author:** ![westhikersacto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d6d6ee/32.png) [@westhikersacto](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/westhikersacto)\ **Post date:** [March 29, 2026, 7:08am UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/27 "2026-03-29T07:08:04Z")
The problem you have with krauss comes from the scientific hypocrisy of the atheist community. YOu guys embody all the weakneswses you attack believers for. here is the atheist dilemna - rationality and science. how does atheist reliance on an unobeservable multiverse parallel their critiicsm of believers The parallel lies in the leap of faith required to accept something that cannot be empirically verified. When critics point out this irony, they usually focus on three main areas: Evidence vs. Inference: Atheists often criticize theists for believing in a God that cannot be seen or measured. However, because other universes (by definition) exist outside our own observable bubble, the Multiverse is also currently unobservable. Both groups are inferring a “hidden” reality to explain why our world looks the way it does. The “Fine-Tuning” Problem: Many scientists use the Multiverse to explain why our universe is perfectly “tuned” for life (if there are infinite universes, one was bound to be right). Theists use God for the same explanation. Critics argue that “infinite unproven universes” is just as much of a metaphysical construct as a single unproven Creator. Falsifiability: A cornerstone of the scientific method is that a theory must be able to be proven wrong. Critics argue that since we can’t interact with other universes, the Multiverse theory is unfalsifiable, moving it out of the realm of “hard science” and into the realm of “belief systems” similar to religion. Essentially, the critique is that both sides are using an invisible “infinite” to solve the mystery of why we are here. ---
**Author:** ![westhikersacto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d6d6ee/32.png) [@westhikersacto](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/westhikersacto)\ **Post date:** [March 29, 2026, 7:09am UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/28 "2026-03-29T07:09:51Z")
how does atheist reliance on an unobeservable multiverse parallel their critiicsm of believers The parallel lies in the leap of faith required to accept something that cannot be empirically verified. When critics point out this irony, they usually focus on three main areas: Evidence vs. Inference: Atheists often criticize theists for believing in a God that cannot be seen or measured. However, because other universes (by definition) exist outside our own observable bubble, the Multiverse is also currently unobservable. Both groups are inferring a “hidden” reality to explain why our world looks the way it does. The “Fine-Tuning” Problem: Many scientists use the Multiverse to explain why our universe is perfectly “tuned” for life (if there are infinite universes, one was bound to be right). Theists use God for the same explanation. Critics argue that “infinite unproven universes” is just as much of a metaphysical construct as a single unproven Creator. Falsifiability: A cornerstone of the scientific method is that a theory must be able to be proven wrong. Critics argue that since we can’t interact with other universes, the Multiverse theory is unfalsifiable, moving it out of the realm of “hard science” and into the realm of “belief systems” similar to religion. Essentially, the critique is that both sides are using an invisible “infinite” to solve the mystery of why we are here. ---
**Author:** ![morgankane01](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/morgankane01/32/28536_2.png) [@morgankane01](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/morgankane01)\ **Post date:** [March 29, 2026, 7:47am UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/29 "2026-03-29T07:47:01Z")
> [@westhikersacto](#): > > Essentially, the critique is that both sides are using an invisible “infinite” to solve the mystery of why we are here. First, multiverse is more an hypothesis, than a theory. [A sum up](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse) Second, you can believe in god and in multiverse. the debate is outside the debate about releigion. Third, there is no relationship between the idea of infinity and religion Fourth, most atheists know that there is no metaphysical reason for humanity to exist. There is no mystery. We are the result of evolution. ---
**Author:** ![cutslikeaknife](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/cutslikeaknife/32/31306_2.png) [@cutslikeaknife](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/cutslikeaknife)\ **Post date:** [March 29, 2026, 8:02am UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/30 "2026-03-29T08:02:34Z")
You are all good with the Epstein class Westy which is what this thread is about ---
**Author:** ![cutslikeaknife](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/cutslikeaknife/32/31306_2.png) [@cutslikeaknife](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/cutslikeaknife)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2026, 10:38am UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897/31 "2026-04-06T10:38:52Z")
> [@cutslikeaknife](#): > > Dont try and wiggle out of this one. You think its acceptable for the political class to be friends with rich pedophiles ? And with that Morgan Kane exits the building !!! Sad [Previous page](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/richard-dawkins-friend-and-apologist-of-a-pedophile/11897.md?page=1)