Well, there go the margins. You do realize, don't you, that there are no prizes given out for being annoying?True, Einstein was fairly sure that the universe was not expanding and a closed system, this is true. So what if Hubbell decided to be a baker, and invented the donut with no hole, instead of cosmic inflation? Ok I will tell you. You, yes you would be here, discussing, believing and accurately describing, why the universe can not grow any larger than it is. Can you spot Einstein, if he decided to act, instead of pour bullshit like the static universe into peoples minds? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/Healthywealthy.jpg
Quantum of light, electron, wave, duality , . . . . . are only fragments in QM.
. . .
The basis of QM is reference frame.
There isn’t theory without reference frame.
In order to understand theory at first of all we need to know
its reference frame.
The reference frame is a scene on which everything is happened.
For example.
The conditions of reference frame of savanna was given the life
to lions and giraffes. Lions and giraffes will not like the cold
polar-bear’s reference frame . . . . . . .
. . . . .
“Quantum of action” has its scene - reference frame.
a) In Dirac’s “sea” “quantum of action” is maybe a “virtual fish”.
b) In Schrodinger’s “empty box” “quantum of action” is maybe a “cat”.
Maybe “alive”, maybe “dead”.
c) In the “11- dimensions” or in the “M-dimension” “quantum of action”
is a “string-particle”. Maybe “open”, maybe “closed”
d) And in SRT “quantum of action” exists in Minkowski “cone”.
==…
Of course this post is funny but it is because nobody was explained
me what the reference frame of QM is and if you know then, please,
explain it to an amateur as I am.
==…
...Can you spot Einstein, if he decided to act, instead of pour bullshit like the static universe into peoples minds? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/Healthywealthy.jpgObviously. The hair gives it away.
My conclusion.
Nature is not an absurd structure.
It is our “scientific” thought of Nature can be absurd,
it is our “philosophy of science” can be abstract.
How is possible to escape philosophical absurd?
My solution.
The history of the “quantum of action” (1900-1927) shows that
quantum of light, electron and antiparticle can be one and the same
real particle of different actions . . . . . because the particle obeys
“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass".
This particle (quantum of action) created everything in Nature.
==…
My solution.
The history of the “quantum of action” (1900-1927) shows that
“quantum of action” can be a quantum of light, and
“quantum of action” can be an electron, and
“quantum of action” has connection with an antiparticle . . . . .
In the other words,
quantum of light, electron and antiparticle can be one and the same
real particle of different actions. This is possible because “quantum
of action” obeys “ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass".
“Quantum of action” has many formulas and they can be tied together
only through physical process of “transformation” but what “transformation”
means according to one single “quantum of action” nobody explains.
Existence begins on the quantum level and “quantum of action” is
primary particle of existence and he/it created everything in Nature.
==…
...Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is primary particle of existence and he/it created everything in Nature. ==.."he/it"? I cannot follow most of what you are talking about, but I would be quite surprised to learn that a quantum particle has a gender.
...Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is primary particle of existence and he/it created everything in Nature. ==.."he/it"? I cannot follow most of what you are talking about, but I would be quite surprised to learn that a quantum particle has a gender. The Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is primary particle of existence. Not from "big bang", not from "Higgs boson", not from "string particles in 11-D", not from "meson, muon, tau . . . . and 1000 their brothers" but only from Planck's / Einstein's "quantum of action" creation of Nature was began. ==..
...Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is primary particle of existence and he/it created everything in Nature. ==.."he/it"? I cannot follow most of what you are talking about, but I would be quite surprised to learn that a quantum particle has a gender. The Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is primary particle of existence. Not from "big bang", not from "Higgs boson", not from "string particles in 11-D", not from "meson, muon, tau . . . . and 1000 their brothers" but only from Planck's / Einstein's "quantum of action" creation of Nature was began. ==.. I think it began with Potential (David Bohm) .
...Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is primary particle of existence and he/it created everything in Nature. ==.."he/it"? I cannot follow most of what you are talking about, but I would be quite surprised to learn that a quantum particle has a gender. The Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is primary particle of existence. Not from "big bang", not from "Higgs boson", not from "string particles in 11-D", not from "meson, muon, tau . . . . and 1000 their brothers" but only from Planck's / Einstein's "quantum of action" creation of Nature was began. ==.. I think it began with Potential (David Bohm) . To believe or to know ? There is a "potential" state and there is an "active" state. The way from "potential state" to "active state" can go only through a physical process /action that was called "transformation", "fluctuation". Questions: 1) what is formula of particle in a "potential state" ? 2) what is formula of particle in an "active state"? 3) what physical action "transformation" is really mean? 4) is geometrical form of particle before (in a potential state) and after (in an active energy state) "transformation" remains the same? Did David Bohm explain these points? =================