# Philosophy of Science predicated by two meanings of Observation

**URL:** <https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/philosophy-of-science-predicated-by-two-meanings-of-observation/2576>\
**Category:** Philosophy\
**Created:** [January 31, 2013, 11:03pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/philosophy-of-science-predicated-by-two-meanings-of-observation/2576 "2013-01-31T23:03:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![arnoldguetta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de053/32.png) [@arnoldguetta](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/arnoldguetta)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2013, 11:03pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/philosophy-of-science-predicated-by-two-meanings-of-observation/2576/1 "2013-01-31T23:03:06Z")

</div>

Has the philosophy of science in the last 700 years been for understanding Observation;  
Optics and Testing have changed the meanings of our observations;  
We observe these meanings as changes in our lives;  
Is life the effect of Observation when we observe;  
Is Observation a Value in the Cosmos Universe? also,  
Philosophy is about noumenon—about the existence of observation–  
Science is about phenomena—-about the observation of existence–  
Discriptions areSyntactic/semantic predicates of Observation