# Philosophy of science of philosophy

**URL:** <https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/philosophy-of-science-of-philosophy/11624>\
**Category:** Philosophy\
**Created:** [July 9, 2025, 7:58pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/philosophy-of-science-of-philosophy/11624 "2025-07-09T19:58:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lausten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/forum.centerforinquiry.org/lausten/32/23705_2.png) [@lausten](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/u/lausten)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2025, 7:58pm UTC](https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/philosophy-of-science-of-philosophy/11624/1 "2025-07-09T19:58:43Z")

</div>

This is fun. A young woman talks to Tyson likes they are old friends, challenging him, playfully.

[![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/centerforinquiry/original/3X/e/8/e8d7fb245b6dcc1c5f772764ee89b21b85928405.jpeg "The Philosophy of Physics, with Elise Crull") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHO_glbVcIg)

They get to the trap of when you say you aren’t taking a philosophical position, that’s a philosophical position. Some more solid examples are given of when people, like Newton for instance, pursued a philosophical path and missed the physical answers that were there. He figured it out, because he was Newton, but, check it out.