Quoting PLaClair: My definition of a miracle = an occurrence that produces a result so marvelous that we didn’t think it was possible.
And just about everything we accept as standard from canned goods to computers would be considered miracles by everyone two hundred years ago.
Occam
That's true. In fact, we could look at it that way today: we can marvel at and be inspired by the history of human progress in science and technology. Sagan surely was. Tyson is. Einstein was. And the harm in that is . . .?
Einstein said there are two ways of looking at things. One is that nothing is a miracle. The other is that everything is. The Humanist conception of miracles recognizes that it's all in how we look at things subjectively. It's an attitude. I prefer a positive attitude over a negative attitude. They're both attitudes. Why not adopt the attitude that looks forward and upward and that inspires us to do more? Many of our greatest creative geniuses did exactly that.