Again rat, you offer nothing useful to say. If it is nonsense then you’ll have to do better than a simple say so. I wish it was that easy but I can’t just call something nonsense without saying why it is so. Judging by your replies it doesn’t seem like you practice what you preach.
Unless you find holes in what he is saying (which I wish I could but I haven’t seen it), then I’ll just have to conclude that you don’t know what you’re talking about. I think you might be out of your depth.
Even the bit about the self you weren’t very helpful, just…loud. I used to think there was something that you would get to if you cleared it all away like the Broward people said, but it seems like that’s more like the end-result of a series of actions (pursuing a hypothetical) that result in such a state but don’t prove it. I have to accept Susan’s remark about it, though it doesn’t prove much other help really.
As for what this other guy said, I can’t really verbalize or write much of it out since I mostly “think” in feelings, sensations, and movement (it’s weird and takes a long time to explain, I’m doing my best on here). But the more I think about it the more sense it makes (not that I relish that fact). I mean I think it is based on the idea of where does X come from, and how far back you can take that untill you get to the beginning of the universe. Since there is no “ness” (or inherent essence to things) then it’s all just the universe, which I “guess” is what he means by not real (but even that is a stretch). Kind of like how what seems to be separate pieces its all just connections of one big whole.