Smart kid, Lausten, she just probably doesn't have the concept of rhyming down, yet. I didn't at age 4.
But, James, this statement for example:
"... the cosmological singularity consists of a three-aspect structure: the final singularity (i.e., the Omega Point), the all-presents singularity (which exists at the boundary of the multiverse), and the initial singularity (i.e., the beginning of the Big Bang). These three distinct aspects which perform different physical functions in bringing about and sustaining existence are actually one singularity which connects the entirety of the multiverse.
Christian theology is therefore preferentially selected by the known laws of physics due to the fundamentally triune structure of the cosmological singularity (which, again, has all the haecceities claimed for God in the major religions), which is deselective of all other major religions."
Really? In regular person English, you are saying that since somebody came up with a concept of a three part "cosmological singularity", and since Christianity has a 3 in one deity, Christianity, is therefore the correct religion amongst all of mankind's religions.
You can dress crap up in an extremely erudite looking and scholastically formatted apparel, but it continues to be, dressed-up crap. I realize that I am sounding harsh, but if you have convinced yourself of all this, take a break, do something useful (or fun) with your formidable intelligence.
Humans can discover physical laws, but they are not responsible for them.
In classical relativistic cosmology, the Initial Singularity and the Final Singularity are permanently separate and distinct singularities. But in quantum relativistic cosmology, the Initial and the Final Singularities are connected by a third singularity: the All-Presents Singularity, since all sizes of universes are obtained in the multiverse, which means that there are a class of universes which don't expand out from the Big Bang singularity at all, but remain as a singularity.
These three distinct aspects to which perform different physical functions in bringing about and sustaining existence are actually one singularity which connects the entirety of the multiverse: the Cosmological Singularity, of which consists eternally of three hypostases in a homoousian triune, i.e., three distinct entities of the same substance (ousia).
Christian theology is therefore preferentially selected by the known laws of physics due to the fundamentally triune structure of the Cosmological Singularity within the Omega Point cosmology, which is deselective of all other major religions. And the Cosmological Singularity has all the haecceities claimed for God in the major religions.
For more on the inherently triune nature of the Cosmological Singularity, see Sec. 7.3: "The Trinity of God", pp. 43-45 of my previously-cited article "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", which also gives many more details on how the Omega Point cosmology uniquely and precisely matches the cosmology described in the New Testament; additionally on this topic, see my article "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", also previously cited within this thread.
Wow. I guess all of the other trinity-god religions throughout history, were selected and then de-selected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_deity#List_of_triple_deities
Or more, likely, you are a victim of the human proclivity for seeing patterns and interpreting them to conveniently fit your worldview.
Hi, TimB. Trinitarianism holds that there is one God (i.e., one substance), Who consists of three Persons (i.e., hypostases)--not multiple Gods.
Occasionally it's suggested that Hinduism also holds to a concept of a divine Trinity, involving "the 'triple form' (trimurti) in which the cosmic functions of creation, maintenance, and destruction are personified by the forms of Brahma, Visnu, and Siva respectively." (See p. 139 of Freda Matchett, Ch. 6: "The Puranas", in Gavin Flood [Ed.], The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism [Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2003], pp. 129-143.) In actuality, this notion appears to be mostly a case of Westerners' eagerness to find corollaries with Christianity in other religions. As historian and Indologist Prof. Arthur Llewellyn Basham writes (see pp. 310-311 of A[rthur]. L. Basham, The Wonder that Was India: A Survey of the Culture of the Indian Sub-Continent Before the Coming of the Muslims [New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1959]):
""
Early western students of Hinduism were impressed by the parallel between the Hindu trinity and that of Christianity. In fact the parallel is not very close, and the Hindu trinity, unlike the Holy Trinity of Christianity, never really "caught on". All Hindu trinitarianism tended to favor one god of the three; thus, from the context it is clear that Klidsa's hymn to the Trimūrti is really addressed to Brahm, here looked on as the high god. The Trimūrti was in fact an artificial growth, and had little real influence.
""
For more on the triune nature of the Cosmological Singularity, see Sec. 7.3: "The Trinity of God", pp. 43-45 of my previously-cited article "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", which also gives many more details on how the Omega Point cosmology uniquely and precisely matches the cosmology described in the New Testament; additionally on this topic, see my article "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", also previously cited within this thread.