@thatoneguy
Like it or not, identity is not, absolutely not, a value in humanism, on the contrary. Even more the secular humanism of the Enlightenment. Humanism is a universalist tradition of thought.
You say humanism is a White thing.
Catholicism, of which humanism is supposed to be a disguised version, is also a White thing, I suppose? So one will have statements like “France is a Judeo-Christian country”.
Then why catholicism is a universalist religion?
Why catholicism was born in now Arabic regions, developed in at the time Hellenistic regions, and institutionalized in Western European countries, and now we find more Catholics, in absolutely neither Arabic, Hellestinic or European countries such as South America, Africa and South-East Asia? Can we still say that Catholicism is a White thing? Same for Islam.
It is also the same for humanism.
We can discuss how developed humanism from a geographical and historical perspective, but this is a different, orthogonal matter, to what is humanism.
We can also discuss if and how to spread humanism in a humanistic manner, but that is also a different, orthogonal matter.
There are many ethnicity-based thought traditions, for instance German volk culture. Humanism is not one of them. So associating identity to humanism indifferently is just incorrect, and can act as a self-fulfilling dangerous prophecy.
It is because identity is not a value in humanism, so humanism literally saved the life of tones of people adhering to humanism accross the globe who were able to join humanist societies, and improved my life (coming from a developed and democratic country, but adhering to the, what I deem better, more liberal/human, American humanism, as compared to French humanism).