Or was it a Holiday Inn you stayed at last night?
Sorry,
I can't imagine a real scientist formulating such a list, let alone bring it to CFI for investigation.
So what's up. :smirk:
We can start with the basics.
Pray tell where would you find non-living nature here on this Earth? :long:
On another forum 3 people responded. They were able to do that without being disrespectful.
A scientist is someone who is openminded and always wants to learn more. Sorry if I let you down on your expectation of what a scientist is supposed to be like.
“Non-living" nature stands for life just before it appeared on earth. Possibly for life just after it appeared for those who want to believe protein was synthesized only after life first appeared.
The way protein is synthesized now (cellular life) is not the way many researchers envision it to be when life first started. Theory goes synthesis would have happened from simpler molecular building blocks: CO2, H2O and N2 (possibly with small amounts of H2, CH4, or NH3) they think were available in the prebiotic atmosphere.
I studied a fair amount of full text studies where researchers tried to create amino acids/peptides from these simpler molecules. But this is as far as they can go. And being able to build bricks (racemic amino acids) is somewhat different from being able to build a house (biologically functional protein build from laevorotary amino acids only).
The questions I ask regard some of the the scientific gaps in knowledge, regarding abiotic protein synthesis as imagined by researchers.