The appointments to oversee Wall Street which pretended to investigate the frauds that the big bankers, brokers and other wealthy and powerful schemers but did not even try to put any of them in jail is another example. Likely, the schemes would have linked the cons directly to the politicians and friends as the investors who gained from them. It was not rationally possible not to discover anything since there were plenty of people willing to come forward to prove this but were absolutely ignored! The billions of dollars stolen by these people ruined the economy and harmed people in more real ways than what President Clinton did. His act to “get a blow job" is a personal indiscretion that has zero effect to other people’s lives and fortunes. Other than his own personal relationship, the only people it had any consequence to is to religious assholes who seem to think somehow their god is going to curse America or something. Also, the costs to the taxpayers by the Republican Congress to attempt to indict him was another absolute rhetorical device meant to create a monster out of a Democrat when they had nothing real to actually vilify him with.
I agree on the issue about Bill Clinton. I am not interested in the private lives of officials. Also ironic was one of the main people who went after him was Newt Gingrich, who himself cheated on his wife. Regarding holding Wall Street accountable, well the Democrats were in control of the Presidency, the House, and the Senate for the first two years of Obama's presidency and didn't hold anyone's feet to the fire. Regarding oversight in the run-up to the crisis, that was the result of numerous problems, from the SEC being understaffed to the complexity of the modern financial instruments.