I am not sure how to answer this. I am sorry you feel that people here have been nasty to you. There has been no name calling, no ad hominem attacks, just a request that you provide specifics and defend your position. We have challenged your ideas and for that I have no apologies. This is a skeptic site. Challenging others to support their ideas and beliefs with evidence is what we do. Mckenzie is a Veterinarian and I am an Internal Medicine physician so we are both very familiar with the topics you bring up and I am more than willing to listen to your ideas but you really have not presented us with anything except vague claims and insinuations that naturopathy offers something that traditional medicine does not. We can’t have a discussion or debate if you don’t give specifics.
I have to add that if anyone here is making assumptions it appears to be you. You have made disparaging comments to the effect that conventional medicine treatments are guided by financial interests and imply that naturopathy magically is not but provide no evidence to support that argument. You are making assumptions about both MD’s and ND’s simply because of the letters they have after their names.