Does America need the law of the jungle - the second amenemnt to the US Constitution?

Couple of questions.
What is a “Militant Atheist"?
What is “preached atheism"?
I guess Devin Kelley.
[Antireligion is opposition to religion. The term may be used to describe opposition to organized religion, or to describe a broader opposition to any form of belief in the supernatural or the divine. Antireligion is distinct from atheism (the absence of a belief in deities) and antitheism (an opposition to belief in deities), although anti-religionists may be atheists or antitheists.]
Am I to assume that Devin was ok with religion, but did not like deities? I bet he didn’t know the difference. I think that it is Fake News when the reporters don’t keep news fully understandable at a sixth-grade levels for the general public.
As far as “preached atheism", words from a classmate. But passed on by the press. Picked up by the public. But how is the public understanding the meaning? Should the reporters or editors have some responsibility of not spreading misleading statements? Should rewording the statements into standard meanings that everyone can understand be done. I have never seen the news quote a Cajun word for word in any news format. So, why is it ok to quote unclear meaning and create misunderstanding? That is Fake News.
“Guns not used in the civilized countries". Does not mean what you intend it to mean. That is Fake also, or misleading at best. I think it would be correct to say there is no murders in countries that do not have guns. But I can’t say that because that is not true. Those countries just use knives or other methods. So, being civilized does not measure the level of common sense of the people. These items are used in misleading ways mostly for political reasons. Watch the Democratic Party pick up and run with the gun issue. The general public is not that stupid and is getting tired of Fake BS.