Ok, well you’re telling personal stories couched as philosophy (where person refers to those who believe in the perspectival notion). Very old school and way too personal or anthropocentric. Being and non-beings, perceptions, etc. are human characteristics, and so all your explanations and fancy talk are just limited personal stories told in a manner that seems to have something to do with the world. And that’s really all the old philosophers did, though some way better than others.
But I guess to stay in your mode of thinking, because it is somewhat interesting, if small…what do these thinkers think about times prior to any sentient human? Is the idea that there has to be a sentient being of some sort to perceive things? And the notion of a being that has existence. How do we know whether those couple concepts, “being”, “existence” are even relavent to understand the universe?