A succinct summary of our time

No. Would you just take a stand? State what you believe and make a case for it. What game are you playing here?

If its not impossible , why are you asking if its possible?

Why dont you answer the original question ?

Wrong answer . Then why do we still have poverty ?

You ask questions, we answer each in our way. In fact, you are not interested by the answers, or by stating your position, just by disqualifying us. And each time we answer you neglect the answer and ask another question, without any logic, just evading the debate.

The original question was is there change? Lausten answered that there is change and demonstrated it. You answered by a no sequitur question and reproach us to not answer you.

You are not Socrates, and we are not your students.

1 Like

Thats highly debatable

The original question was why cant change happen - in that poverty still exists.

Do not misrepresent the conversation

Grammatically that’s not a question, or a sentence. I can’t make sense of it.

Then, I answered:

And you can’t deny i did !

Thats a cowards cop out

We’re 9 responses into this conversation without having determined what the question is. Any reasonable person could have bowed out days ago with no regrets.

The irony of calling others playing games

I answered your question and you did as if i had not posted … What game are you playing?